Monday, September 30, 2013

XF300/305 Masterclass: You are watching

XF305 & XF300 – Canon's XF305 and XF300 professional camcorders offer an impressive amount of features including 4:2:2 Full HD CompactFlash recording at 50Mbps, a new 3CMOS sensor array, a newly developed 18x L-series HD Video lens, and redesigned controls for optimum use and ease of handling. In this exclusive CPN ‘walkthrough' we guide you around the XF305 and XF300 models to explain the key features and controls of the camcorders.

Friday, September 27, 2013

Choosing the right external hard drive for Video Editing


Tuesday, September 10, 2013


Ethics statement: I have not been paid by anyone to do this. I did this review off my own back and purchased both cameras.

Sorry for the delay on this, but it’s worth the wait. I was able to spend a couple of months with the cameras before doing the review which is far better than a knee jerk one.
Why review a small chip camcorder? Are they not a thing of the past? Actually they are a very valuable tool. Easy to operate, stuff is in focus. Great B cams. Yes you don’t get the stunning aesthetic of a DSLR but you don’t get image issues and sound is a piece of cake. These cameras are great cameras for certain jobs and can work well in conjunction with the DSLRs.
First off is the video review, it’s quite long but covers all the info you need, hopefully, then there is some test footage I shot one afternoon whilst on my holiday in Greece with a Gitzo stills tripod.The flickering at around 4 minutes is some glitch. I will go back to the edit…
Enjoy!

Some test footage I shot in May 2010 with the Canon XF105.
Check out my review of this camera and the XA10 at www.gopb.co/xf
Music is Nana Mouskouri,Mera Mayiou
Filmed on the Island of Crete in Greece whilst on holiday!
Although all cameras have the same sensor the XF100 is by far the best feature/ price camera out of the three.
The XA10 is lovely and small, has the same lens and produces great images, the detachable handle is excellent, the in built memory is useful… but it’s these below things that should make you want to look at it’s bigger brother:
The lack of customisable picture profiles that that XF line has.
Proper switches and buttons in the right place, not touch screen.
Superior codec, 50mbs 4:2:2 is a big deal for such a small camera. You don’t have to record in that high if you don’t want to but it’s there and the files are not that big!
Slow motion, both 720p 50/60p or proper overcrank in those modes. Having slow motion is such a bonus and doesn’t have image issues like the 720p of Canon DSLRs. It’s sharp and looks great upscaled.
Fantastic exposure assist histograms.
Better quality PCM sound on XF series.
Did I mention it has proper buttons?!
Only get the XF105 is you need the Genlock and SDI out. It’s a $1000 more.
You can order from B&H below, although stock is scarce…

Friday, August 23, 2013

THE TRUTH BEHIND FILM FESTIVALS

THE TRUTH BEHIND FILM FESTIVALS

This is the first of three articles about Film Festivals. In part 2 I will publish a survey I have conducted with film festival directors around the world, showing the data on their point of view. Part 3 will give a voice to the human stories of the festival directors by sharing stories and advice for filmmakers. This article focuses on the data behind film festivals around the world.
At the bottom of this article I have gone into detail on the methodology I used to uncover these results.  I also list numerous ways in which I regard this study to be lacking, meaning that numbers should be assumed to be around 90%-95% accurate.  The short answer is that I found 9,706 unique festivals which have run at least once the past 15 years, with data from twelve different sources. The main results are:
  • There are around 3,000 film festivals currently active (i.e. ran in the past two years)
  • 9,706 film festivals have run at least once in the last 15 years
  • 75% of all film festivals were created in the last ten years
  • 2009 was the peak year for new festivals
  • 2012 had the lowest number of new festivals launched for 14 years
  • 39% of film festivals only ever run once
  • 71% of film festivals screen short films and 52% screen feature films
  • Half of all film festivals run for less than 7 days
  • North America hosts 70% of the world’s film festivals
  • October is the busiest month, with five times as many festivals as December

I’ve collected data on almost 10,000 film festivals throughout the world, but many of these festivals have either closed or are taking a time-out from running events.  I would say that to be fairly regarded as ‘active’, a festival will need to have run events in the past two years.  By this standard, there are 2,954 active films festivals.

While it can be debated whether or not film is a ‘quintessentially American’ art-form, it is certainly true that film is an American business as nearly three quarters of all film festivals are based in North America.

The data shows that film festivals are often run once, and then never again.  A third of film festivals only lasted a single year, with under a quarter making it past six years old.

Half of all the film festivals I could find were created since 2007, with the peak in 2009.  Since then there have been far fewer new festivals launched.  2012 was the worst year for new festivals since 1999.

The uptick in film festivals in October might be due to a focus on horror festivals around Halloween. Sadly I was not able to find enough data about festival genres to test this theory.

I wasn’t surprised to learn that nearly 4 out of every 5 film festivals screen short films, but I wasn’t expecting the result that only half have any form of competition.  It’s actually nice to see that the image of filmmakers entering festival purely to win prizes is not backed up by the data.

There was a huge spread in the number of days film festivals held events.  Part of the reason for the large number of festivals claiming to run “over 30 days” might be due to year-long celebrations and ‘always on-going’ festivals.

I used a number of data sources for this research including publicly available information on sites like Withoutabox (by far and away the largest credible collection of film festivals online),Short Film DepotFesthomeReelportFestival FocusShort Film CentralBestInFestFilmFestivals.comWikipediaIMDb, theBritish Council and good ‘ol Google.
The data used to calculate the ‘Months of the Year’ came from a smaller sample of just over 1,500 festivals which I could personally verify. This is because the original data showed a disproportionate number of ‘December’ opening nights which did not seem credible. It seemed much more likely that the list was polluted by the quirks of some of my data sources, such as requiring year-round festivals to put a specific date which led many people to put the 31st December. I also suspect that some sites use that date as a default, further skewing the results.

I have been unable to provide a completely accurate and definitive figure on the total number of active film festivals in the world today. My data combines a number of data sources (see ‘Methodology’ for the list) and no one place was perfect.  Below are the claims made by various sites.  I found them to be reasonably accurate, although all had a certain amount of duplication and erroneous data.
  • WithoutaboxWithoutabox say they have “more than 5,000 festivals” although they don’t qualify this by saying how active these festivals are. The number of festivals you can apply to via Withoutabox is either 850 or 900, depending on which page of their site you read.  I ask them for clarification but they have not got back to me in the time it’s taken me to do this survey.
  • FilmFestivals.com use different figures on their site, including 4,0005,000 and 6,000 festivals
  • Festival Focus list 2,303 festivals
  • BestInFest list 1,832 festivals
  • British Council list 1,582 festivals
  • Yahoo list 957 festivals
  • Wikipedia list 437 festivals

I believe this to be a very comprehensive study by the standards of the world of filmmaking, but doubt I will be receiving any honorary doctorates in Asymptotic Statistical Analysis because of it. There are a number of areas I would have liked to have had more, or cleaner, data. For example…
  • I’m sure I missed some festivals and that others could not be counted (being false, not true film festivals, etc). That said, I don’t feel that the margin for error would be high, so the overall trends should be fairly reliable.
  • There is no way of verifying if a festival actually took place, so it’s conceivable that some of my ‘first year’ festivals didn’t actually happen.
  • I speak English and so will naturally have a bias away from festivals which only provide information in a non-English language.
  • My data gathering was largely online, thereby ignoring festivals whose main communication is via offline communities (such as schools, churches and local groups).
  • I am assuming that the information presented to the public is factually accurate. There have been a few times where I have manually excluded data that is demonstrably false (festivals claiming to have been going for almost 100 years despite film only being 125 old).
  • It’s possible some festivals may have been duplicated, although I have cross-referenced names, contact details and websites. It’s conceivable that a festival changed its name and principle points of contact, in which case it would be counted as two festivals here.

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

A useful video on how to set up your Sennheiser radio mics:


Friday, August 16, 2013

I'm very pleased to announce that my film "ANGEL ALLEY" has been invited for the DESTERRO Video Dance Exhibition in Brazil, as part of the POOL - INTERNATIONALE TanzFilmPlattform BERLIN selection.

It will be screened on 17 and 18 of August. 
You can follow us for more information about the Exhibition at :



\




Danny Boyle selects Eastern Edge films WALK TALL & JIMMY WILL PLAY
for Shuffle Festival in East London




Two Eastern Edge films were selected by Danny Boyle for the Shuffle Festival in East London this week. Danny introduced Jimmy Will Play on Monday afternoon, which was screened with the Bollywood feature film Taare Zameen. On Tuesday afternoon, Kate Sullivan's WALK TALL was shown with The London 2012 Olympic Opening Ceremony. Danny Boyle attended the event, and Kate Sullivan (above) had the chance to thank him for screening her film. Danny also recently selected WALK TALL as the winner in a Shooting People short film competition.






Wednesday, August 07, 2013

1987 TV Documentary About Surrealist Cinema Hosted By David Lynch


http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/watch-1985-tv-documentary-about-surrealist-cinema-hosted-by-david-lynch-20130807

This is a real find: David Lynch, waxing lyrical in a 1987 BBC Arena documentary about surrealist cinema. In a triumph of simplicity over budget, this is less a documentary in the traditional sense and more a clip show — but when it's David Lynch introducing the clips, and when they're clips from surrealist films and thus don't suffer much from being shown without the context of the wider film, you have a recipe for a fascinating hour (nor thankfully do they suffer overmuch from being viewed on somewhat degraded 90s videotape).
Lynch offers thoughts, musings and strange hand gestures about a number of film-makers, including Jean Cocteau, Man Ray and Rene Clair. Also, he calls Philadelphia “one of the sickest, most corrupt, decadent, fear-ridden cities that exists”. Sorry about that, Philadelphians. Anyhow, until Lynch decides to make another film – something many people believe may now never happen – we can still enjoy this kind of thing from him. Watch below. [The Seventh Art]

Monday, August 05, 2013


From Raindance:

LOOKING FOR A SPACE TO REHEARSE / CAST / MEET / WORK?
Spaces free in Central London, available with a massive discount!

Located at 10 Craven Street, right next to Charing Cross Station and Trafalgar Square, our two rooms are ideal for use as rehearsal, casting and meeting rooms for arts-based productions and organisations. 



Regular rates are £25 / hour + VAT, Raindance members get 15% off.

Latecomer deal:
If you need a room at short notice, we will give you one on the cheap! If your requested booking is within 3 days of your request we will give you a 15% discount, or 30% if you're a member!

Visit our site here, call us on 0207 930 3412  or email roombookings@raindance.co.uk to make your booking today!

Friday, June 28, 2013

A nice video tutorial about how to shoot on Canon 600D / T3i.


Lesson from Spielberg:



June 24, 2013
Author:
Categories:
IndustryInspirationVideo EditingVideo Production

Filmmaking Lessons from Steven Spielberg

Tips & insights from legendary director Steven Spielberg – inspiring info for creative professionals!

Creative Inspiration Steven Spielberg
If you want to learn how to be a better filmmaker then learn from the best. Here is a roundup of filmmaking lessons from one of Hollywood’s living legends, director Steven Spielberg.
First watch this video essay by Steven Benedict on Spielberg’s techniques and themes, featuring a vast array of visual and audio references from his filmography. Benedict provides an insightful overview of the techniques Spielberg employs in crafting his stories.

If you’re after something a little more immediately digestible then LA video filmmaker has a similar breakdown of 14 of Spielberg’s compositional and blocking techniques with plenty of handy gif examples.
steven spielberg on filmmaking
If you’ve not seen these vintage videos of Spielberg at a AFI (American Film Institute) Q+A session then they’re also a goldmine of insights into the art and craft of filmmaking. This AFI youtube playlist includes every single video featuring Spielberg in their collection.




THE ART OF COLLABORATION


This four part AFI Masterclass, via Filmmaker IQ, between Spielberg and longtime collaborator (40 years long!) and composer John Williams, is a guided tour on the art of collaboration featuring plenty of examples from their own work, as well as the work of others. Having worked together for over 40 years they both know the ins and outs of effective collaboration, so its a real treat to hear two masters discuss it for our benefit.

THE FUTURE OF CINEMA

If you’re following any connected to the film industry on twitter then this recent discussion between Steven Spielberg and George Lucas on the future of the film industry, held at the opening of the Interactive Media Building at the University of Southern California, will have already been tweet quoted to death. But if you’re looking to make it in the brave new world of interactive media, multi-screen media and internet distributed media then there are plenty of great insights to be had.
 I think the key divide between the interactive media and the narrative media is the difficulty in opening up an empathic pathway between the gamer and the character, as differentiated from the audience and the characters in a movie or a television show. That little thing, that little thing called the empathic pathway is currently the great abyss in allowing a player to become emotionally attached to a character. – Spielberg
The link above takes you to Empire’s full run down of the discussion or if you like your reporting a little more new school you can also check out Norman Hollyn and Victor Lucas’ live blog from the event.
Finally if you’re ever thinking of making someone a film for their birthday then you might want to check out the film below made for Spielberg by his friends in the style of Citizen Kane. Or you could just watch it for fun.
Spielberg has always been a positive inspiration for me.  Who influences you most creatively?  Leave your thoughts in the comments below!

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

13 Ways to Cast A-List Actors in Microbudget Films

From: http://filmmakermagazine.com/72600-13-ways-to-cast-a-list-actors-in-microbudget-films/

13 Ways to Cast A-List Actors in Microbudget Films

Julia Stiles in Between UsJulia Stiles in Between Us
My film Between Us is about to come out in theaters and one of the questions I’ve been asked at some of the 22 festivals in seven countries I’ve been to (and yes, that sound you hear is my feet splashing on the beach when I won the Grand Jury Prize in the Bahamas) is how the hell I got a cast like Julia Stiles, Taye Diggs, Melissa George and David Harbour in a movie that according to Kickstarter only cost $10,000? So let me explain…
1. Choose Castable Material. One reason I chose to adapt an Off-Broadway play in the first place is I knew I’d find good, castable material that no one else was turning into a feature. I actually turned down Beau Willimon’s play Farragut North, and George Clooney turned it into Ides of March and got a happy ending from my sloppy seconds. It was good, but I knew would be hard to adapt for a low budget, if need be. But with Between Us, I knew it was at its heart four people in two rooms — how hard could that be? More importantly, the four parts were incredibly well written, with great chew-the-scenery moments for each actor. They were also written for 30-ish-year-old actors, and the two female parts were especially rich. That’s key: There are far more working (and famous) actresses than actors, and there aren’t enough good parts for them. So if you can get a script with really great female roles, you’re golden.
2. Assemble a Team. Contrary to popular wisdom, you don’t needan A-list casting director. What you need is someone who cansound like a credible casting director on the phone. I teamed up with Alison Buck, who’d been recommended by my pal, director Matthew Harrison. Alison had recently moved to L.A. from New Zealand and been working as a casting director in her spare time while also holding down a day job as a manager. Which meant that she had an office, a phone, knew the casting lingo and had the confidence to sound like the movie was happening. Yes, she had some contacts in the agenting world, but that’s not why we got her. She also had the stamina to stay committed to the film for what wound up being over four years.
But the casting director was only part of the team. I also needed to surround myself with a credible group of producers. To that end, I rounded up New Yorker Mike Ryan, who’d had seven films at Sundance. His claim to fame was helping discover Amy Adams in Junebug. I got Hans Ritter in L.A., who’d been instrumental in discovering Ellen Page in Hard Candy. Barry Hennessey was a four-time Emmy winning producer on Amazing Race… and had been my line producer on my previous film. And to top it off, we got Dana Altman, my producing partner on my first film, and Robert Altman’s grandson… not bad casting genes in his DNA! And of course, as the co-founder of Slamdance, and with some good casting under my belt for my previous film (Open Housewith Oscar-nominee Sally Kellerman, Anthony Rapp, Kellie Martin, et al), there was proof that I knew how to work with at least somewhat fancy actors.
3. Aim High. So with that team on paper, we decided to tell people we were making the film for $2 or 3 million! This was in 2007-8, so it didn’t sound so crazy at the time. And at that budget, the prevailing wisdom was to offer something called “Schedule F” which SAG says is a $65,000 flat rate. Now of course, we didn’t have a dime. So that meant we were doing “finance contingent” casting. Which means some of the agents and managers will take you seriously (10% of $65k is still enough to support at least a small coke habit), so they’ll get someone in the office to do coverage on the script and it gets in the system.
4. Go to New York. Something I learned by casting both Open House and Between Us is to target junior agents at the big agencies — and specifically ones in their New York offices. The L.A. talent agents are all running around like crazy trying to get their actors booked into pilot season. Television is where the long-term money is for the agencies. The L.A. people have neither the time nor inclination to worry about indie films, no matter what their budget. But, the New York branches of those same agencies spend more time trying to get prestige Broadway jobs for their L.A.-based high profile actor clients. Consequently, they’re also better attuned to know which actors in their clientele are inclined to want to do (and can afford to do) meaty, “actor-y” roles — whether they be on stage or in indie films. In general, the New York agents also tend to have gone to classier Ivy League schools, think they’re smarter, and have more time on their hands to actually sit down and read a script (and not just pass it on to a bitter intern to do coverage).
The sweet spot is to find a junior agent in New York — someone who just finished being an assistant, just got their own desk, but doesn’t yet have their own assistant. These are the hungry young bucks, eager to make a mark for themselves by discovering great material and prove themselves to their senior agents, A-list clients and the big bosses in L.A. And without their own assistants, they’ll actually answer their own phone!
5. Be Bi-Coastally Curious. From New York, come back to L.A.. This confuses the agencies, in a good way. If they think you’re bi-coastal, they will take you more seriously (Scott Rudin has offices in L.A. and N.Y., why shouldn’t you?). If you live in L.A., get a 917 number. If you live in N.Y., get a 323. Leave messages at 6:00 AM in L.A. or 9:00 PM in N.Y. Then play them off against each other: “Oh yes, that sitcom actor’s good, but your N.Y. colleague has this other Broadway actor that seems more… how do I put this? Substantial. Do you have any feature actors who are better?”
6. Don’t Have a List! Every director has some sort of list in mind about your dream cast. Forget it! You will never get your dream cast. Not all of them, not on your budget, and not on the week you want to start shooting. And then when you do cast someone else, you will always view them as inferior to the person you had in mind when you wrote the script or made your list. This is an important concept both creatively and practically.
Agents spend most of their time soullessly getting offers and pushing them on to their clients. For this, they went to Penn? So, when you meet with that junior agent in NY, tell him or her about the roles, and then say, “Who do you think would be good in this?” All of a sudden, it empowers the agent and makes them emotionally vested in the film. They will undoubtedly come up with the exact same list of clients that you would have thought of from scouring IMDbPro, but sometimes they will surprise you and come up with a new client they just signed, or someone bigger than you thought you could get. The point is, it will be their idea, and they will work ten times harder to get that person than if you had suggested them. Now they have something to prove to you (and their colleagues), and not the other way around.
7. Develop Relationships with Agents Yourself. No matter how good or powerful your casting director is, you as the filmmaker need to develop and cultivate relationships with talent agents and managers yourself: Buy them coffee in Park City, take them out to breakfast in Venice, share sushi on St. Mark’s. Whatever it takes. This is much better time spent than cultivating relationships with actors: You could spend 20 years buddying up to the next Tom Cruise, but when you finally need to cast your famous BFF, they might happen to be in rehab that month, and you’re screwed. But agents or managers who you know will always have other clients available, and will have them for not just this film, but for all your films in the future. That junior agent in New York will be a senior manager in L.A. by the time you make your next movie.
Even if you’ve gotten an A-list casting director, you need to develop these relationships yourself. You may have gotten lucky with a casting director this time, but next year when you want to make a Dogma 95 film in your kitchen, you won’t have a casting director to fall back on. It’s also more impressive for the young agents and managers to speak with the “director” and not just the casting director. Alison and I had a great system: If she contacted an agent, she would constantly refer to “the director” following up with them, and when I knew an agent, I would refer to my “casting director” as following up with them. It gave the impression that we had a real team who cared what that agent thought. And of course we always said our “assistants” would be dropping off a script, though invariably the assistant was me.
8. Play the Agency Game. As friendly as you get with one agent, make sure you’re also friends with another. Typically you get three bites at the apple with an agency: If three actors pass on the same script, they will stop returning your calls. And if all your actors do come from the same agent, then the power shifts, and you’re beholden to that agent — for better or for worse. To keep your casting momentum going, it’s best to play the agencies off against each other. Use the nuggets of success with one agency (“Oh, you know WME’s got the script out to Jennifer…”) as leverage to get the other agencies to move (“Well, yes, I suppose you could slip it to Ben for the weekend read”). Likewise, play the managers off against the agencies. Remember, it’s a game. Have fun with it! (And to really see how much fun it is to play agencies against each other, see this.)
9. Bait and Switch. With Between Us, just as we were getting a great cast, the economy fell through in 2008 and there was no way to make a film for any budget. Luckily for me, I got a book deal on a completely unrelated project, and after it had run its course two years later, we came back to Between Us — but this time the approach was to do it on a microbudget. Yes, we raised $10,000 on Kickstarter (back when that was considered a successful campaign) but indirectly raised another $30,000 or so. That was enough money to be able to pay actors $100 a day (SAG ultra-low scale if your budget is under $200k).
The crew wouldn’t get paid, but that’s our problem, not the actors. The script was exactly the same as before; we never rewrote it for a smaller budget. So we could go back to the same agents and managers we were in touch with before and they would still take our calls and use the same coverage as before. Legally, if you have a backed offer they have to pass it on to their clients, no matter how small that offer is. And frankly, an agent will take you more seriously if you have 100% of a $40,000 budget in the bank than if you have zero percent of a $3 million budget in the bank.
10. Set a Start Date. This is a lesson I learned from Robert Altman: Set a start date, and they will come. For most actors — particularly those who’ve been on TV series, or big-budget movies — they don’t need the money. It really doesn’t matter whether it’s $65,000 or $100 a day. They’re doing it for the roles. The key thing is the start date. If they’re available, they will want to work. Actors abhor a vacuum in their schedules. And there’s nothing agents hate more than whiny clients calling them every day asking why they’re out of work. The start date is more important than the budget: No one wants to get left behind.
11. Make it Real. As soon as you start asking questions like “does your client have any peanut allergies we should be aware of?” (since all you can afford to feed them is PB&J) or “what is your client’s hat size?” (to give the impression that you’ve already hired a wardrobe department), the agents will believe that you really are making the movie.
12. Magnetic Balls of Iron. You need some serious cojones to pull all this off properly. It helps to know that you have backup actors in a pinch. For literally years, I had been meeting actors for coffee (it’s axiomatic that actors don’t eat, so you can take them to reasonably nice places and not go broke). So I knew we could always make the film with talented actors if we wanted. Remember, as you cast, most of these so-called attachments will fall through. The micro-budget indie will always get trumped by the Spielberg film or pilot shoot for Scandal. But as long as they don’t all fall through the same day, you’re fine. In our case, Taye Diggs originally thought he was signing up to be in a movie with Michael C. Hall, America Ferrera and Kerry Washington. But thankfully, as they all dropped out at different times, Taye stuck with the film and we were able to build up our cast again. And of course, his agent was now even more motivated to help us out (which he definitely did).
13. Take Advantage of Others’ Misfortune. As you get closer to that start date, your ability to cast closer to the A-list actually increases. In our case, the best example was Julia Stiles. She’d always been floating around our lists (I lied; of course we had lists), but I knew she was booked for six months in a Neil LaBute play on Broadway. But her agent called me in a panic: Despite rehearsing for a month, that play’s financing had fallen through two hours before, and they needed to fill Julia’s schedule. Was I interested? Yes, make the offer! (I knew her manager was already a fan of the script, having taken him to breakfast in Venice some three years before). Within 24 hours, Julia called me and said she was in. Two weeks later, she was in my kitchen rehearsing the movie.
Now then, was all this the work of years of careful preparation and planning? Or did we simply take advantage of an actress in her most vulnerable emotional state and swoop in to save her? It doesn’t matter. The point is we made the movie with amazing actors who delivered performances that are already winning awards and critical plaudits.
And by the way, remember that so-called $10,000 budget? Once we did get our actors and started shooting, we got a very nice financier to invest in the film. His check may have only cleared three days before the END of principal photography, but clear it did, and even most of the crew got paid. It may not be the ideal way to make a movie, but it’s definitely one way.